Advertisement
I was just curious. How many of you know about Monty Robert's work called "join in"?
He brought a whole new idea of dealing with horses to the world, and in my oppinion, this idea should be spread out for the benefit of both horses and horse people. I'm not so much with horses right now, even though my heart beats for the moment I return to these lovely creatures, but I sure made mistakes with them which could be avoided if I heard of this guy before, or, even better, if my trainers did.
Let me know what you think, and for those who never heard of him, please do some research. You and your horse deserve it.
Maja
He brought a whole new idea of dealing with horses to the world, and in my oppinion, this idea should be spread out for the benefit of both horses and horse people. I'm not so much with horses right now, even though my heart beats for the moment I return to these lovely creatures, but I sure made mistakes with them which could be avoided if I heard of this guy before, or, even better, if my trainers did.
Let me know what you think, and for those who never heard of him, please do some research. You and your horse deserve it.
Maja
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Sat, February 11, 2006 - 11:55 AMI believe it's called Join Up. There are a score of "trainers" making big bucks off programs like this - Pony Boy (who, by the way, rides poorly!) and a bunch of others. Isn't it Monty Roberts who walks around with his fat belly shoved into a white suit???
Anyway, each and every trainer than has created a "system" has good points and bad points. It's up to the horse owner/rider to sort out the good and what works for their particular horse. My daughter rides her 17 hand Thoroughbred with a string around his neck - ala' whats-their-names. Only problem is when she tried their fancy training methods (some other idiot was paying for it) her horse tried to kill her for waving a big whip around him. You just gotta' read this stuff with an open mind.
PS we have about 35-40 students, a lovely "flock" of school horses and a barn full of owner's horses and they are all well behaved and well loved - without sticking to any one trainer's book. You know, I can't say that for all the riders however....
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Sat, February 11, 2006 - 7:27 PMPersonally...I think he's full of it...I heard from a friend that she saw him at midnight the night before a demo at Equine Affaire in Mass....he was roundpenning a problem horse until it was in a full lather, eyes white and about ready to climb out of the pen he was so terrified...Monty just kept running the horse in circles. The next day I saw the demo, and the horse was still terrrified...Monty swore to the crowd he had never worked with the horse before. Left a bad feeling in my heart for sure. I had to leave the demo I was so upset...he attached these pom poms to the back of a saddle and ran the terrified horse around in circles. There was nothing soft about his method...no feel.
This is all my personal opinion...but having seen him at a couple of demos I am not the least bit impressed. If you want to see true horsemanship in action, and see what FEEL really is, watch Leslie Desmond (one of the best in my opinion...she leared from Bill Dorrance), Buck Branaman, Mark Rashid, Harry Whitney, Ray Hunt...they were doing this stuff WAY before Monty Roberts every joined the Natural Revolution.
Read True Horsemanship Through Feel if you want to discover what FEEL is...it changed everything for me. Run don't walk to see any of the horsemen/women above. Mark Rashid is based in CO, and he is one of the most amazing horsemen I have ever seen.
All the best,
Lisa -
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Sun, February 12, 2006 - 11:30 PMIt is best to judge by your own experience. I have never seen him, so maybe I wouldn't be so impressed, too. Just by reading it, it seamed like a good idea.
Thanks for sharing this with me. I will check Leslie and others.
Maja -
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Mon, February 13, 2006 - 9:31 AMI have read a couple of Mr. Roberts' books, and have seen him in person at few times, most recently at a Horse Expo in California. While I do respect SOME of what he has to say, I was very disturbed to see that he didn't exactly practice what he preaches. I have never seen a horse more terrified than one of his demo horses, whom he pushed far to hard and fast. It wasn't at all the gentle, subtle, communicative technique that he espouses in his books. I know that he was pressured to provide results to the crowd within a very limited timeframe, but he did so at the expense of the horse, which was pretty far from okay with me. I lost a lot of respect for him after seeing him work in person.
But I do think he has some valid points - he's just better making them on paper than in person. -
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Mon, February 13, 2006 - 6:09 PMLoch,
My experience seeing him in person was the same...I thought that the horse was so terrified there was no possible way any good could come of it...the horse was so tired I think it just gave up...very sad.
I think a lot of what he "says" not does are things he's gleaned from other NH folks to tell you the truth. Bill and Tom Dorrance, Ray Hunt...It's interesting how what he says and what he does are so completely different.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Thu, February 16, 2006 - 9:46 AMOld pat parelli is the man i like - he's learnt from dorrance and the like - and although he's very commerical with his style - I have seen such good results from it that i cant possibly see what harm it does.
I like the idea of learning 'horse' rather than horses having to learn our language and 'ways'.
I never thought much of the monty roberts style because he goes on about join-up - which is very easy to do. and then what does one do then? he has no program of training. he also boasts that he can ride a wild horse in half an hour or something. which in itself is stupid, as no two horses will be the same and some will take months, not minutes... to be sat on.
Thats wht impressed me about Pat Parelli - is that evenwith the horses he gets in for challenges - he doesnt push them for the sake of a good show. which i respect him for. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Thu, February 16, 2006 - 10:31 AMI have seen Pat Parelli at Horse Expos and on tour, and you're right - he puts the horse first. He doesn't rush things just for the sake of a good show. (Don't get me wrong - he IS a showoff - but when he wants to show off, he shows off with his own very well-trained horses...) His methods are mostly non-confrontational, and seem to make a lot of sense to the horses I have approached using them.
Having also read Ray Hunt, Tom Dorrance, Mark Rashid, and Buck Branaman, there is a common thread that runs through thier work - put the horse first, and learn to communicate in a way that makes sense to them. The horse is ultimately the judge of how well you're doing...that makes sense to me! -
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Mon, February 20, 2006 - 8:03 PMSpent time with Pat P...can't say as I agree with you guys...
I suggest anyone read True Horsemanship Through Feel and spend time with Mark Rashid or Leslie Desmond if they want to see Feel.
I was on the brink of becoming a Parelli Instructor, and like many others, have shifted my perspective to using Feel instead. Not to say that Parelli and others in his organization don't have any Feel...but I couldn't see enough of it through the gross commercialization to go through with the program and maintain my integrity.
Ray Hunt, Mark Rashid, Harry Whitney, Leslie Desmond...I feel good about recommended any of them to my students and friends. Parelli...can't honestly say I feel good about.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Sun, February 19, 2006 - 5:04 PMMonty seems a little star struck too. yeah he might be able to turn a problem horse around in one setting but how effectively? I prefer quality over quantity (time in this case). Buck B. definately has my vote. Check out his Book: "Faraway Horses". Its about his life and how he came to being the trainer is now. Parelli is great too.
Tara -
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Mon, June 26, 2006 - 11:47 AMI talked to one of my trainers (Barbra) about this topic. Barbra was my childhood riding teacher and she is currently teaching my husband... She recommends Buck Branaman. Here is his web site:
www.brannaman.com/index.htm
According to Barbra Monty was arrogant in person when she met him - she said in her opinion he is not a true horse whisperer and she does not even like that term anymore because of him... I respect Barbra's opinion (she has years of experience and she taught me alot of what I know about horses) but I still hold respect for Monty from his books I've read and the DVD I've seen. If I meet him in person and I find he is arrogant then obviously I would agree with her. I do not like to judge anyone without meeting them.
Me and my husband have been using Monty's techniques on our spooky Morgan horse from the DVD we bought and they are truly helping him calm down and slowly become less fearful of things.
I'm going to read up more on Buck Branaman. I like what he has to say on his web site.
Best,
Ayshah -
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Tue, June 27, 2006 - 7:47 AMBuck Branaman is a great horseman...he learned from some of the best (Dorrance brothers)
I would go to see him in person, or any clinician for that matter. You will see where the truth lies. You get so much more watching them in person, see the subleties.
Leslie Desmond, Mark Rashid and Buck Branaman are the best I have seen so far...I would love to see Harry Whitney too, I hear he is amazing.
I highly recommend the book True Horsemanship Through Feel...it's the type of book you keep on hand to delve into, not to read cover to cover. It's like a bible.
Leslie also just came out with a series of 10 CD's, I hear they are a great teaching tool. Lots of wisdom in that woman.
Monty...well, let's just say I have seen him in person, met him, heard about him from others, and I am far from impressed. Pretty much repulsed. Sorry. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Tue, June 27, 2006 - 12:59 PMI will look into True Horsemanship Through Feel. Thank you for sharing the names of all these trainers to look into!
Best,
Ayshah
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Mon, June 26, 2006 - 2:35 PMI'm going to check Buck B. out! Thanks for the info!
-
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Tue, February 21, 2006 - 10:38 PMThank you very much!
You have all been very helpfull.
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Sun, June 11, 2006 - 9:53 AMMr. Roberts did not invent "join-up". He learned it from his own father who was actually a very kind and decent man. The procedure was an old one already well known by many horsemen. I inadvertently stumbled onto the method myself when I was a kid...too bad I didn't realize I could use it to become rich and famous.
Mr. Roberts' message is warm and fuzzy and makes people feel good. Many folks have said that his advice has helped them with their horse handling problems. One must acknowlege those positive aspects.
However, it seems that Mr. Roberts has not lived his life according to the mantras he espouses such as "Violence is never the answer."
You can learn more about Mr. Roberts by reading the book "Horse Whispers & Lies" full and complete online at www.horsewhispersandlies.com .
Some people are so upset to learn that their idol is, after all, merely human, and so they attack the authors of the book.
I've done a bit of research and am satisfied that Horse Whispers & Lies is the truth and that Mr. Roberts, although an excellent horseman, is perhaps not the most excellent human being.
The "join-up" procedure itself, more properly called "hooking on" as it was known before Mr. Roberts coined and trademarked his own term, is not suitable for use with every horse. Sometimes it can be a useful starting point in horse training. And that is all it is.
Not even Mr. Roberts himself has been successful with every horse that he has attempted to use the method on. That's a fact.
Neither did everyone beat their horses until Mr. Roberts showed us the error of our ways, LOL!
And NO, the Tom Booker character of the book and film "The Horse Whisperer" were NOT based on Mr. Roberts. Nicholas Evans denies that on his own website's FAQ! Evans does credit Hunt, Dorrance, and Brannaman. Buck Brannaman consulted for the film and doubled for Robert Redford in it. -
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Mon, June 12, 2006 - 5:13 PMI have three very good friends who were at either a Ray Hunt or Tom Dorrance clinic, I can't remember which, where they all met and talked to Monty Roberts. This was before he became "famous". He later denied that he had ever been to either of the gentlemen's clinics. They are all three amazing horsmen, one having spent a year with Ray, and all three are the most honest and upright friends you'd ever want. Their memories of Mr. Roberts was that he was a know-it-all slimeball, reminded them of the archetype used car salesman.
A little irony, the most outspoken one against Roberts ended up with a Jack Russel terrier that traced directly back to Robert's dogs, which of course is her baby. LOL
ps I like Clinton Anderson's approach. More no-nonsense than many of the others. He is much more like Ray Hunt in his approach, but for me, is a better teacher than Perelli or Hunt. I understand he was a prototege of Perelli. I was also impressed with Bryan Neubert.
If you get a chance to see Ben Quinters, or work with him, he's also a great trainer and teacher. What a nice guy!
Bear -
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Tue, June 13, 2006 - 3:28 PMI just attended another Western States Horse Expo in Sacramento this weekend, and found quite a few trainers to rave about. I attended the clincs put on by Van Hargis, Raye Lochert, Chris Cox, and Leon Harrell. Van Hargis credits Tom Dorrance with a lot of his approach, and Raye Lochert is a cerified John Lyons instructor. Chris Cox took it slow and easy with a horse who didn't want to have it's feet handled, and by the end of the clinic, the woman that owned the horse could handle it's feet herself. Leon Harrell is a cutting horse trainer of sterling caliber (and it took my breath away to see him cutting, bareback and bridleless)...if you ever get an opportunity to attend an event like that, I highly recommend it. You can tell for yourself by the relationship they cultivate with the horses whether they're just blowing smoke.
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Tue, June 13, 2006 - 8:07 PMI'm with you. I have my preferences (don't we all?) but my top favorite is Dennis Reis, followed by Clinton Anderson. After reading the posts, I have witnessed the same "fear" characteristic with ol' Monty. And probably some of my disdain comes from anyone who could speak so poorly of his own father, who was a horse trainer as well, is beyond me. They say the "apple don't fall far from the tree" and everyone who trains has different approaches. And not all are good. Monty's dad kind of went with the "fear and intimidation" method, which many reknowned trainers have used. Do I agree? Heavens no!!
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Tue, June 13, 2006 - 6:33 PMI have heard most of what your saying in other media. I have been skeptical in what Mr Roberts has been saying. I do agree however that the "join up" style of training is a good starting point. I have used it with my own horses. I used to tell people that I train a horse. I do not break him. I just did not know the right terminology apparently.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Tue, June 13, 2006 - 6:23 PMI have read his book and seen some of his clinics on TV. I have even incorporated some of his techniques into my training methods. I really like the round pen as a training device. It is so much easier to start out a young horse or warm up a seasoned horse. I do not know how I ever servived with out one. I use to lounge but I do not anymore unless I am out where I do not have a round pen.
I have gotten horses to do many of the signs of joining up but have never gotten one all the way in. But the working of the horse in "Monty's style" has worked out very well for me. I trained a Quarter Horse stallion with Monty's method and he is now my favorite horse to ride. He is as calm as can be. I am contributing his calmness and good riding ability strictly to him (the horse). Not to me (the trainer). I have been traininig for quite a while but I am no pro. I like to ride and do a little open show stuff but mainly trail ride.
I am planning on going on a trail ride later this week. I am trying to debate on where to go. I have been riding in this area since I was a kid so I am getting a little bored. But it is still going to be a good time. -
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Fri, June 16, 2006 - 4:50 PMWhat "gets" me, is the whole "join up" cliche`, it's as if Monty is trying to monopolize a concept that is utilized by all good trainers. Whatever you want to call it, "join up" is simply softening the horse to the degree that you overcome is initial fear. They are a creature of prey, not a predator, so it is this survival instinct that you are trying to effectively manage. If the prinicples are working for you, outstanding! My problem lies within someones attempt to commercialize a concept that is (or should be) universal. Horses can very readily confuse kindness with weakness: I am not saying to brutalize or intimindate with abuse. But face it, look at horses in a pasture together, and really watch and see how they establish their "pecking order." We can learn so much from horses themselves if we would just take the time to listen.... -
-
On leadership
Sat, June 17, 2006 - 10:08 AM"But face it, look at horses in a pasture together, and really watch and see how they establish their "pecking order." We can learn so much from horses themselves if we would just take the time to listen...."
Mark Rashid has some excellent observations on how horses establish the pecking order in pasture. He has found that there are two types of leaders in a herd. One is the bully - this horse exerts its will on others by force, using teeth and hoofs as necessary, or just threatening (pinned ears, cocked hind leg, etc). The other horses will yield to this horse, but they won't like it. Then there's the passive leader. This horse is the real leader of the herd. The other horses respect this horse. If this horse needs to make a request to another horse, it will use the barest minimum of expression to make the request known. This is the horse that leads them from place to place, from grass to water, brings them in to the barn, etc.
Both horses can make the other horses "move their feet" when necessary, but one is far more effective at getting along with the others as well.
I strive to be the type of leader to my horses that the "passive leader" is in pasture. Sometimes I have to get bigger than I want, I end up being more like the bully. If I have to do that to ensure my own safety, I do. But I don't go in with my horses planning to act like that. It's a safety net, not a daily way of working with them. -
-
Re: On leadership
Wed, June 21, 2006 - 10:13 PMI couldn't agree with JC more! Mark Rashid is an amazing horseman. He has some incredible insights into horse behavior and how we can help horses adjust to the unatural way we confine them and "use" them...I've seen him in person, and I can only say "WOW"
Leslie Desmond is beyond words as well...but she has a much different teaching style and not as accesible. If she is ever in your area RUN to see her and keep an open mind and leave your ego at the gate. She will break you down and you will see yourself being REBORN if you are open to it.
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Wed, June 21, 2006 - 4:09 PMMe and my husband recently bought Monty's DVD on how to handle a spooky horse. We learned a lot from it! The only "negative" thing I can say is that we both thought it was for dealing with adult spooky horses - instead it dealt with one yearling. However the DVD is worth seeing.
I have not met Monty in person so I cannot say if he is sincere or not but from his books and the DVD I have seen he does seem to practice good horsemanship. You can check out his web site at:
www.montyroberts.com/
My Grandpa was a jockey and later a horse trainer. He taught the old way - rough and "cowboy" if you know what I mean? There are things he did (using spurs for example) I do not agree with but frankly some of the things he did worked. There is something to be said for some of the old fashion methods.I think it depends on the horse... I have found a balance of old and new ways in horsemanship works best. You want your horse to respect you NOT fear you. You want to show affection to your horse but not let him/her think they can push you around.
I just bought a new horse last week. She is a sorrel Quarter Horse trained in team penning and neck reining. She is beautiful and well mannered! I will post some photos of her soon.
Best,
Ayshah
-
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Wed, June 21, 2006 - 4:32 PMPlease don't denigrate the use of spurs. Many of the kindest, and best trainers use spurs. The use of spurs, as with any tool, can be used with care or abused. The proper use of spurs can develop incredibly soft and willing responses in a horse, and conversely the improper use can develop a very hard and unwilling horse. I talk about developing "power steering and power throtle response" with the use of spurs. I rarely ever ride with spurs on my personal riding horses, mostly because I find spurs somewhat cumbersome [I tend to trip over them when I get off to clear trails, or when doing ground work.] ;o) However their use can developed a horse that is so soft in their response to leg cues, that they are a dream to ride. The most subtle leg cues will move them forward, side to side, away from a tree, up beside a gate, etc, with ease. Without the proper use of the spurs I doubt that my horses would be anywhere near as soft or as willing as they are. Also, with a young horse, there are situations where they may save serious injury to the horse or the rider, as when you may have to grab the arm of a child roughly to save them before they dart into traffic.
Bear -
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Wed, June 21, 2006 - 4:41 PMI agree that if used in the right manner they can be helpful. My Grandpa used them correctly (as a child I did not like seeing them used on my Palomino I guess b/c with me he was gentle and I did not see a need for them with him - my Grandpa used them on my Palomino b/c with everyone else he was a high spirited horse) but I have seen other trainers use them in an abusive way - I have seen horses with blood covering their sides from them.
Sorry if I came across 100% against spurs. I should have said I only agree with them if used correctly. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Fri, June 23, 2006 - 5:27 AMI agree with most of what is being said. Mr. Roberts did take a method of training, give it a name, and commercialize it. Maybe I am just not very well read but you did not hear as much about the technigue until he started talking about it. I am sure some people have changed or at least modified the way they work with horses due to Roberts promotion. In my opinion any change in the better in working with a horse is a good thing. I was using a lot of what Roberts talked about ,I just had not named it. If only I would have thought of that you would be taking about me right now.
-
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Wed, June 21, 2006 - 10:17 PMA great horsewoman or horseman will help the horse discover it can move off of RELEASE. It's an amazingly profound concept. But I am convinced it is the way the horse desires to move. Most horses push into pressure, period. I have a Percheron that you had to basically thud with every fiber of your being (at 3!) to get her to move...when she and I worked it out with some help from some amazing horse folks, she now moves when I release my legs and send energy outwards with them...They are smart creatures, and highly adaptable to the right energy.
-
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Thu, June 22, 2006 - 1:01 PMI like the vision of the release of legs and the energy moving out. My horses essentially do that in that I open my inside leg to let them move into the space given them. I only use the opposite leg when needed to encourage them. The same principle is used with reins, especially in teaching a horse to neck rein. Laying the rein against the neck, but letting that rein slide in your hand and creating an opening for them to move into on the opposite side, or in your terms sending the energy outwards with the rein.
Bear
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Sat, June 24, 2006 - 8:04 AMMonty Roberts is great at what he does. I have seen him work in person and I have read all of his books and seen most of his DVDs. I guess you could say I'm a huge fan of his! When I first bought my paint gelding he was in bad shape. He had been abused. He was a biter! By having patience and working with Monty's techniques I was able not only to teach him biting is wrong but in time I was able to help him become a reliable horse who I enjoy doing barrel racing with now as well as reining and simple trail rides. I even let my daughter ride him! He has become quite gentle. It took four years of dedicated work with him but he has become a great horse for all ages.
Spurs? In my personal experience I have seen nothing good come of them! I have worked with a lot of horses. From what I have seen riders who need spurs are lazy with their legs. I do not like the use of crops either. Perhaps some will say I'm extreme but I believe if you have patience and determination you can get most horses to work with you without ANY pain. There are some horses however not meant to be ridden. I do not think spurs of any kind should be used. -
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Mon, June 26, 2006 - 8:30 AMCorrectly used, spurs are only an extension of the rider's leg, for the purpose of communicating more clearly. Spurs (I use the 'humane' style that have rounded knobs instead of rowels) allow the rider to be very specific about which part of the horse's body the cue is applied to, for separate and distinct responses to pressure according to where the pressure is placed.
The more advanced the horse and rider become (the professional levels of NRHA, for example), the more precise and definitive these cues and responses become.
Your horse may indeed have been abused. I have seen, though, that many horses with bad habits were actually spoiled or allowed to develop bad habits by riders who were too timid or not proactive enough. The next novice to get the horse will make an assumption that the horse has behavior problems because he was abused, rather than spoiled.
I've seen even very nice horses develop bad or dangerous habits because of timid riders or because of riders who did not offer the horse leadership.
-
-
-
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Thu, July 24, 2008 - 12:03 PMI've seen Monty Roberts a couple of times now at Equine Affaire in Pomona.
What I saw did not in any way recommend him to me as someone worth listening to on the subject of training horses. I found him to be unprofessional, uninformative and even duplicitous. It was clear to me that he was a showman who was there to try to make money off of me, not a teacher hoping to share his knowledge.
1) He was more interested in selling than in teaching, and the horses were only there as props. He treated them even more peremptorily than he treated his helpers.
2) Neither he or his kids/students/paid trainers/acolytes showed any appreciable feel for the animals they were working with. At a minimum I expected to see skills on a par with the average "horse trainer wannabe". I was very disappointed.
3) He didn't demonstrate any appreciable technique: For example, instead of showing us how to teach a horse to spin, he brought out a champion cutter that *someone else* had trained, and spun it a few times without explaining how or why the horse was able to do it. All he offered was that he "wanted to show us what a good one looked like".
4) He used equipment that was inconsistent with most accepted "natural horsemanship" practice: in particular, a snubbing halter with a wire in the flash band that could choke down on the horse's nose (which he had available for sale in his booth if audience members cared to buy one). This device is mostly not used by competent horsemen except in extreme situations because, like a war bridle, it tends to make a horse want to flip over. It's also almost always unnecessary if one does one's homework properly with a horse. Like many tools, it can be viewed as the last resort of the careful, or the first resort of the incompetent or the impatient.
5) Out of an hour presentation, about 10-15 minutes involved discussing the training of horses. He filled the rest of the time by playing music, showing off famous horses, *singing a song he wrote* and reciting his curriculum vitae repeatedly for the audience.
6) He used TEN MINUTES of his presentation time to air his personal ire at the way he was introduced because the MC forgot some of his titles and credentials.
7) He mislead the audience about what he was doing: during one exhibition I saw, he ran a horse around the round pen a few times and then went and stood by the gate of the pen. The horse, of course, when pressure was removed promptly made a beeline for the gate. Monty trumpeted this to the audience as evidence that the horse had "joined up" with him. The horse, on the other hand had never exhibited any of the behavior of horses when they hook on: the lowering of the head and "negotiating", giving an ear or turning the head, turning to face, or even coming directly to him.
8) When trailer-loading one horse, Monty military-marched him back and forth a few times, tried to drag him up the ramp and when that didn't work, he put the snubbing halter on him and hauled on him, the snubber clamping down tightly on the horse's muzzle. When the horse still wouldn't load, he had his helpers close fence sections behind the horse until the horse was being forced into the trailer. When the horse STILL wouldn't load, Monty called for more helpers to help put more force behind the fence until the horse was SHOVED into the trailer. If any reader of this post is unclear on how egregious this technique is, I refer them to Bill Dorrance's marvelous book "True Horsemanship Through Feel".
9) At one of the presentations, his manner suggested that he was either drunk or hung over. He most certainly wasn't behaving in a way one would associate even with a professional showman, much less with a caring, career trainer of animals.
These are only the things I personally witnessed. I can't speak for anyone else's experience of the man.
If someone is looking for good guidance in a traditional "natural horsemanship" style of training horses, some reputable people I have ridden with and developed high opinions of are: Ray Hunt, Buck Branaman and Peter Campbell. These folks clinics aren't cheap. Nor will they hold your hand as a student. They're oldschool cowboys who've found a better way to make a living as clinicians and they still evince an attitude that you are responsible for yourself and if you're there to learn, then study until you figure it out. You also won't get near as much out of their clinics if you don't attend on horseback. However, if you do... and if you work at what you learn from them until you own it for yourself, you'll find that you've gotten on the path to becoming something of a horseman.
Just my opinion,
-- Mack Mackenzie
-
-
Re: Join in - Monty Roberts
Thu, July 24, 2008 - 2:46 PMhas anybody here seen Gawani Ponyboy work?
i have never seen him but have enjoyed reading his books...I wonder how his clinics are~
-